CBSE Class 11 Economics Notes — Indian Economy 1950-1990

Class 11 Economics notes on Indian Economy 1950-1990: five year plans, land reforms, Green Revolution, IPR 1956, import substitution and the 1991 reforms.

Chapter Summary

This chapter explains how India, after 1947, chose a mixed economy and began planning through five year plans aimed at growth, modernisation, self-reliance and equity. It reviews land reforms and the Green Revolution in agriculture, the licensing-based industrial policy of 1956, the role of the public sector, import substitution in trade, and why the policy framework was widely criticised by 1991.

Key Concepts

Choosing an Economic System After Independence

When India became independent in 1947, its leaders had to decide how the economy should be run. Every society must answer three basic questions: what to produce, how to produce it, and who should get the output. Pure capitalism lets markets answer them, which means goods go to those with purchasing power. Pure socialism lets the state answer them, with distribution based on need and almost no private property.

Jawaharlal Nehru leaned towards socialism but did not want the Soviet model, where the state owned every farm and factory. That was neither workable nor acceptable in a democracy that respects private property. India therefore chose a middle path: a mixed economy with a strong public sector, a private sector allowed to function, and a democratic political system. The government would prepare plans and the private sector would be invited to join the effort.

This thinking showed up in the Industrial Policy Resolution of 1948 and in the Directive Principles of the Constitution. In 1950 the Planning Commission was created, with the Prime Minister as its chairperson, and the era of five year plans began. A plan is a statement of how national resources will be used to reach stated goals within a fixed period. Indian plans ran for five years, while longer perspective plans looked twenty years ahead. Importantly, Indian plans did not dictate the output of every item; they concentrated on sectors where the state played the lead role, such as power and irrigation, and left the rest to the market.

Key Points

Examples

Goals of the Five Year Plans

Indian planners set four broad goals: growth, modernisation, self-reliance and equity. Because resources were limited, each plan stressed some goals more than others, and some goals could even pull against each other, so planners had to balance them.

Growth means a rise in the country's capacity to produce goods and services, usually seen as a steady increase in Gross Domestic Product, the market value of all final goods and services produced within the country in a year. GDP comes from the agricultural, industrial and service sectors, and the share of each is called the structural composition of the economy. India's structure was unusual: by 1990 the service sector already contributed the largest share, around 40 per cent, unlike most developing nations.

Modernisation means adopting new technology, such as better seeds or machines, and also changing social outlook, such as giving women the same opportunities as men in workplaces.

Self-reliance means avoiding imports of things that can be produced at home. It was emphasised in the first seven plans because a newly free nation feared dependence on foreign food, technology and capital could weaken its sovereignty.

Equity means that the benefits of growth must reach the poor. A country can grow fast and still have widespread poverty, so planners wanted every citizen to meet basic needs like food, housing, education and health and wanted inequality of wealth to fall.

Key Points

Examples

Land Reforms in Agriculture

At independence about three-quarters of Indians depended on agriculture, yet productivity was low and the country had to import food. Colonial rule had left a system in which intermediaries such as zamindars and jagirdars collected rent from the actual cultivators and did little to improve the land. Policy makers tackled this through land reforms, which are changes in the ownership of landholdings.

The first step, taken soon after independence, was abolishing intermediaries so that tillers became owners. The logic was one of incentives: a person who owns the land keeps the profit from higher output and therefore invests effort and money in improving it. About 200 lakh tenants came into direct contact with the government and were freed from exploitation, which helped raise output.

The second step was land ceiling, which fixed the maximum area one person could own, to reduce concentration of land in a few hands.

Both measures fell short of their equity aim. Some former zamindars retained large areas by exploiting loopholes, some tenants were evicted on the plea that owners were cultivating themselves, and sharecroppers and landless labourers gained little. Big landlords challenged ceiling laws in court and used the delay to transfer land to relatives. Only Kerala and West Bengal, whose governments were firmly committed to land to the tiller, implemented reforms effectively, so large inequality in landholding persists.

Key Points

Examples

The Green Revolution and Its Effects

Because Indian farming depended on the monsoon and old methods, output stayed low. The Green Revolution broke this stagnation. It refers to the sharp rise in food grain production, particularly wheat and rice, achieved through high yielding variety seeds. These seeds only deliver when combined with the right amounts of fertiliser, pesticide and a dependable water supply.

The first phase, roughly the mid 1960s to mid 1970s, was limited to better-off states such as Punjab, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu and mainly benefited wheat. In the second phase, from the mid 1970s to mid 1980s, the technology spread to more states and more crops. As a result India became self-sufficient in food grains and no longer depended on other nations for food.

Higher output matters economically only when it reaches the market. The part of produce sold by farmers is called marketed surplus. A large marketed surplus lowered food grain prices relative to other goods, which helped low-income families who spend most of their income on food, and it let the government build buffer stocks for shortages.

There were risks: only big farmers might afford the inputs, and HYV crops were more prone to pest attack. The state responded with cheap loans for small farmers, fertiliser subsidies and agricultural research institutes. Over time small farms matched the output of large ones, so the benefits were shared widely.

Key Points

Examples

Subsidies and the Occupational Structure

Subsidies, money support from the government for production, were used so that farmers, especially small ones, would try the new and risky HYV technology. The chapter presents both sides of the debate today.

Critics argue that once the technology is profitable and widely accepted, subsidies should end. They note that much of the fertiliser subsidy ends up with the fertiliser industry and with farmers in prosperous regions, not the poor, and that it strains government finances. From the viewpoint of prices acting as signals of scarcity, free or cheap water and electricity encourage waste, tempt farmers to grow water-intensive crops in dry regions, and lead to overuse of chemicals that harm the environment.

Supporters reply that farming in India remains risky and most farmers are poor, so removing subsidies would widen inequality between rich and poor farmers and violate the equity goal. In their view the correct response is to target the subsidy so that only needy farmers receive it, not to abolish it.

A major weakness of the 1950-1990 period was the occupational structure. Agriculture's share in GDP fell sharply, yet the share of people working in it barely changed, remaining around 65 per cent in 1990. Industry and services failed to absorb surplus farm labour, which many economists regard as an important policy failure.

Key Points

Examples

Industrial Policy: Public Sector, Licensing and Small Industry

At independence, industry was narrow, mostly cotton textiles and jute, with two good steel firms. Poor countries progress only with a solid industrial base, which gives stable jobs and promotes modernisation. Private industrialists, however, lacked the capital and the market size to undertake large projects, and the socialist outlook also favoured state control of the commanding heights of the economy, as the Second Plan put it. So the public sector was to lead and the private sector to complement it.

The Industrial Policy Resolution of 1956 formalised this by dividing industries into three groups: those exclusively reserved for the government, those where private firms could supplement the state while only the government opened new units, and the remainder left to private enterprise.

Even the private sector was controlled through licensing. No new unit could start, and no existing unit could expand output or diversify, without a government licence. Licences were easier to obtain in backward areas, where units also got tax relief and cheaper electricity, to promote regional equality.

Small-scale industry was encouraged after the Karve Committee of 1955 saw its value for rural development. A unit is classed as small by the maximum investment in its assets. Being labour intensive, such units create jobs, so certain products were reserved for them and they received lower excise duty and cheaper bank loans.

Key Points

Examples

Trade Policy: Import Substitution

India's trade policy through the first seven plans was inward looking and is known as import substitution. The aim was to replace imports with goods made at home. For example, rather than buying foreign vehicles, the country encouraged its own industries to make them.

Protection took two forms. Tariffs are taxes on imported goods, which make them costlier and discourage purchase. Quotas set a limit on the quantity of a good that may be imported. Both restrict imports and shield domestic firms from foreign competition.

Two ideas supported this approach. First, young industries in developing countries could not compete with those of advanced economies, but if protected they would learn and become competitive. Second, planners feared that scarce foreign exchange might be wasted on luxury imports. Exports received little serious attention until the mid 1980s.

The approach produced real results. Industry's share of GDP rose from about 13 per cent in 1950-51 to nearly 25 per cent in 1990-91, with annual industrial growth of around six per cent. Industry became diversified beyond textiles and jute, and sectors such as electronics and automobiles developed behind protection. Small-scale units gave people without large capital a chance to start businesses.

However, protection lasted too long. Indian producers had a captive market, had no pressure to improve quality, and could sell poor goods at high prices.

Key Points

Examples

Evaluation of the Planning Period and Need for Reform

The chapter ends by weighing achievements against failures. On the positive side, industry diversified widely, India reached self-sufficiency in food grains thanks to the Green Revolution, and the hated zamindari system ended. The public sector built a broad industrial base and gave opportunities that private capital then lacked.

On the negative side, many public sector enterprises performed poorly. They kept operating in areas no longer needing state monopoly, such as telecommunication services, where customers waited long for connections because there was no competition. Loss-making government firms were hard to close and drained limited resources, unlike private firms which cannot afford to survive endlessly on losses. Defenders respond that public enterprises exist to serve welfare, not to earn profit.

The licensing system, often called the permit licence raj, was misused: large houses took licences to block rivals rather than to produce, and industrialists spent time lobbying ministries instead of improving products. Protection from imports, justified as self-reliance, removed the pressure to raise quality and left the export sector underdeveloped.

These problems, along with a changing global environment, convinced policy makers that the system needed to change. In 1991 India introduced a new economic policy aimed at making the economy more efficient, which is the subject of the next chapter.

Key Points

Examples

Frequently Asked Questions

Define a plan. Why did India opt for planning?

A plan states how a nation's resources will be used to reach specific goals within a fixed time. India chose planning because after independence it needed to build industry, raise living standards and reduce inequality, and the market alone, with little private capital, could not do so. Planning, with the public sector in a lead role, was a way to direct scarce resources towards national welfare.

Explain the four goals of Indian five year plans.

Growth is a rise in the capacity to produce goods and services, measured by GDP. Modernisation is adopting new technology and changing social outlook, such as equal opportunity for women. Self-reliance is avoiding imports of goods that can be made at home. Equity means the benefits of development reach the poor and wealth inequality falls so basic needs are met.

What were land reforms and why were they needed? Explain their types and limitations.

Land reforms are changes in the ownership of agricultural land. They were needed because zamindars and other intermediaries collected rent without improving farms. Two main measures were abolishing intermediaries so tillers became owners and imposing land ceilings. Loopholes, court delays, evictions of tenants and neglect of landless labourers limited success, except in Kerala and West Bengal.

What is the Green Revolution? How did it benefit Indian farmers and the economy?

The Green Revolution was the large rise in food grain output, mainly wheat and rice, from using high yielding variety seeds with fertiliser, pesticide and irrigation. It made India self-sufficient in food, increased marketed surplus, lowered relative food prices for poor consumers and let the government build food stocks. Small farmers gained through cheap loans, subsidies and research support.

What is marketed surplus and why is it important?

Marketed surplus is the portion of agricultural output that farmers sell in the market instead of consuming themselves. It matters because higher production helps the wider economy only if it reaches the market. A larger marketed surplus during the Green Revolution reduced food prices relative to other goods and allowed the government to procure grains for buffer stocks.

Discuss the case for and against agricultural subsidies.

In favour: subsidies encouraged farmers to adopt risky new technology, and since most Indian farmers are poor, removal would widen inequality. Against: much of the fertiliser subsidy benefits the fertiliser industry and richer farmers, burdens public finances, distorts price signals and encourages overuse of resources. A balanced view is to keep subsidies but target them at poor farmers.

Why did about 65 per cent of the population still depend on agriculture in 1990?

Although agriculture's share in GDP fell significantly between 1950 and 1990, its share of employment hardly changed. The industrial and service sectors did not generate enough jobs to absorb workers from agriculture. Economists regard this failure to shift labour out of farming as an important weakness of the policies followed during the planning period.

Why was the public sector given a leading role in industrial development?

Indian industrialists lacked the capital for large projects, and the market was too small to encourage them even if they had funds. In addition, the socialist approach aimed for the government to control the commanding heights of the economy. The public sector therefore led in vital industries while private firms played a complementary part.

Why and how was the private sector regulated under the Industrial Policy Resolution of 1956?

The resolution divided industries into three categories, reserving some entirely for the state. Private firms were regulated through licensing: no new unit, expansion or diversification was allowed without a licence. The aims were to keep output in line with the economy's needs and promote regional equality by favouring backward areas with licences, tax concessions and cheaper power.

Explain import substitution. How does it protect domestic industry, and what were its drawbacks?

Import substitution replaces imports with domestic production. The government protects local firms using tariffs, which are taxes on imports, and quotas, which cap import quantities. This helped industries such as electronics and automobiles to grow. The drawbacks were captive markets, poor quality and high prices, and neglect of exports, which led to reform in 1991.

CBSE Class 11 Economics Notes — Indian Economy 1950-1990