Liberalisation, Privatisation and Globalisation: An Appraisal (Chapter 3)

The Economic Crisis of 1991: The Need for Reform

To understand the LPG reforms, we must first understand the crisis that prompted them. By 1991, India was on the brink of economic collapse. The government's expenditure was far exceeding its revenue, leading to a massive fiscal deficit. This deficit was often financed by borrowing from banks and the public, and even by printing more money, which caused high inflation. The situation was worsened by a severe Balance of Payments (BoP) crisis. India’s imports were much more expensive than its exports, and foreign exchange reserves plummeted to a level that was barely enough to finance two weeks of imports. International lenders lost confidence in the Indian economy. To overcome this crisis, India approached the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), or World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a loan. These international agencies agreed to help, but on the condition that India would liberalise and open up its economy, removing the restrictions it had placed on trade and private sector participation. This pressure led to the announcement of the New Economic Policy.

The Three Pillars of the New Economic Policy

Liberalisation

Refers to the process of removing or reducing restrictions and controls imposed by the government on economic activities. It aimed to 'unshackle' the economy from the complex web of licenses, permits, and regulations that had stifled growth and entrepreneurship. Key areas included industrial sector deregulation, financial sector reforms, and tax reforms.

Privatisation

This involves the transfer of ownership, management, and control of public sector enterprises (PSEs) to the private sector. The government's poor management and losses in many PSEs were a major drain on its finances. Privatisation was seen as a way to improve efficiency, promote competition, and generate revenue for the government through the sale of its assets.

Globalisation

This means integrating the national economy with the world economy. It involves creating a borderless world for trade, capital, technology, and even people. The goal was to expose the Indian economy to global competition, attract foreign investment, and adopt modern technology, thereby boosting efficiency and growth. Outsourcing is a major outcome of globalisation for India.

Measures Taken Under Liberalisation, Privatisation, and Globalisation

1. Liberalisation Reforms — Several key measures were introduced. Industrial Sector Deregulation: The 'License Raj' was abolished for most industries, allowing private players to start businesses without extensive government permission. Only a few industries (like alcohol, cigarettes, defense equipment) still required licenses. Financial Sector Reforms: The role of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) was shifted from a regulator to a facilitator. Private banks, both Indian and foreign, were allowed to operate, increasing competition. Tax Reforms: Both direct taxes (like income tax) and indirect taxes were simplified and reduced to encourage compliance and stimulate economic activity. Foreign Exchange Reforms: The Rupee was devalued to boost exports, and the exchange rate was moved towards a market-determined system.
2. Privatisation Reforms — The primary method for privatisation was disinvestment. This means selling a part of the equity (shares) of Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs) to the private sector and the public. For example, shares of companies like Maruti Udyog Ltd. and VSNL were sold. The government believed this would bring in private capital and managerial efficiency. In some cases, this involved a strategic sale, where a majority stake (51% or more) was sold to a private company, transferring management control completely.
3. Globalisation Reforms — To integrate with the world economy, India undertook several steps. Trade Policy Reforms: Quantitative restrictions (quotas) on imports were drastically reduced. Tariff Reduction: Customs duties and tariffs on imports were progressively lowered to make foreign goods cheaper and increase competition for domestic industries. Foreign Investment: The limits on foreign equity participation were raised, and procedures for approving Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) were simplified to attract more foreign capital and technology.

Important Exam Tips

When answering questions about the LPG reforms, always start by briefly mentioning the 1991 economic crisis as the context. This shows the examiner you understand why the reforms were needed, not just what they were. A common mistake is to confuse the terms. Remember:

• Liberalisation is about reducing rules for everyone.
• Privatisation is about changing ownership from public to private.
• Globalisation is about connecting with the world.

Also, be careful with the term 'disinvestment'. While it is the main tool for privatisation, it is not the same thing. Disinvestment can be minor (selling 10% shares) without transferring control, while privatisation implies a significant shift in control to the private sector.

Practice Questions with Solutions

• Q: Why were economic reforms introduced in India in 1991? A: Step 1: Identify the core reasons for the crisis. The main drivers were internal fiscal issues and external trade imbalances. Step 2: Explain the internal problems. The government's expenditure consistently exceeded its revenue, leading to a high fiscal deficit. This was financed by borrowing and printing money, causing high inflation and reducing the purchasing power of people. Step 3: Explain the external problems. India faced a severe Balance of Payments (BoP) crisis. Imports were far greater than exports, and foreign exchange reserves fell to critically low levels (enough for only about two weeks of imports). This eroded international confidence. Step 4: Conclude by linking the crisis to the reforms. To secure an emergency loan from the IMF and World Bank, India had to agree to conditionalities that required opening up its economy, leading to the New Economic Policy of 1991. Final Answer: Economic reforms were introduced in 1991 due to a severe economic crisis characterized by a high fiscal deficit, rising inflation, a critical Balance of Payments deficit, and dangerously low foreign exchange reserves. These reforms were a condition for receiving financial assistance from the IMF and World Bank.
• Q: Explain the policy of liberalisation. What were the major reforms undertaken in the industrial sector under it? A: Step 1: Define liberalisation. Liberalisation refers to the process of freeing the economy from direct government controls and regulations that restricted private sector initiative. Step 2: List the key industrial sector reforms. The main reforms aimed to dismantle the 'License Raj'. Step 3: Elaborate on the reforms. - Abolition of Industrial Licensing: For almost all industries, the requirement to obtain a license to start, expand, or diversify a business was removed. This was retained for only a handful of strategic or sensitive industries. - De-reservation of Public Sector: The number of industries exclusively reserved for the public sector was drastically reduced from 17 to just a few (like atomic energy and railways). - Freedom to Import Capital Goods: Industrialists were given freedom to import capital goods and technology to modernise their operations. Final Answer: Liberalisation means reducing government controls on the economy. Under this policy, major industrial sector reforms included abolishing the industrial licensing system for most industries, de-reserving many industries previously exclusive to the public sector, and allowing businesses the freedom to import capital goods to improve efficiency.
• Q: What is disinvestment? How does it relate to privatisation? A: Step 1: Define disinvestment. Disinvestment is the act of the government selling its shares (equity) in Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs) to the public or private entities. Step 2: Explain the purpose of disinvestment. The main goals are to raise funds for the government, improve the efficiency of the PSE by bringing in private participation, and encourage wider public ownership. Step 3: Explain the relationship with privatisation. Disinvestment is the primary method used to achieve privatisation. Privatisation is the broader concept of transferring ownership and control from the public to the private sector. Step 4: Provide an example to clarify the link. If the government sells 10% of its shares in a PSE, it is disinvestment. If it sells 51% or more of its shares to a single private company, it is both disinvestment and privatisation, because the control of the company has now shifted to the private sector. Final Answer: Disinvestment is the sale of government-held equity in public sector enterprises. It is the main tool used for privatisation. While any sale of shares is disinvestment, it leads to privatisation only when the sale is large enough (typically over 50%) to transfer ownership and management control from the government to the private sector.
• Q: Critically evaluate the impact of the LPG policies on the agricultural sector in India. A: Step 1: Identify the positive and negative impacts. The LPG reforms had a mixed and largely negative impact on agriculture. Step 2: Discuss the negative impacts. Public investment in agriculture, especially in infrastructure like irrigation and power, was reduced after 1991. The removal of fertilizer subsidies increased the cost of production for farmers. Increased international competition due to trade liberalisation exposed small and marginal farmers to price fluctuations and competition from cheaper imports. Step 3: Discuss any potential positive impacts. The reforms provided some farmers with access to global markets, potentially leading to better prices for export-oriented crops. However, this benefit was limited to a small number of farmers growing commercial crops. Step 4: Conclude with a balanced summary. While globalisation opened up export opportunities, the reduction in public investment, removal of subsidies, and increased import competition led to a slowdown in the growth of the agricultural sector. The sector has faced increased volatility and distress, particularly affecting small farmers. Final Answer: The LPG policies had a largely adverse effect on Indian agriculture. Public investment in the sector declined, subsidies were reduced, and exposure to international competition increased, leading to higher input costs and lower price stability for many farmers. The growth rate of agriculture slowed down post-1991, and agrarian distress became more widespread.

Frequently Asked Questions